Conflicting Testimony & Mistakes

The Biggest Mistake

You can easily be said that the biggest mistake if it was a mistake indeed, was the handling of this investigation as if it were a run-of-the-mill suicide. Without being hyperbolic I can say that in many ways this case was handled like a fender bender in regards to the amount of energy and time that was spent on the investigation process itself, and even in the decision as to how to handle it.

From the very beginning, the script was set. If one listens to the 911 calls every one of the 911 callers calls in what looks to be a suicidal person on the overpass. And most certainly did appear that way. And in the deck brothers stated in written testimony that they saw what appeared to be a suicidal man “flailing” on the overpass and attempted to save him from throwing himself over.

If one spends but a moment considering the possibilities other than suicide one can come up with a list rather quickly.

That the man was on drugs and out of his mind.
That the man was incurring an acute psychiatric breakdown.
That the man had either not taken his medication or was overmedicated.
That the victim was being bombarded with V2K
That the man was involved in a stunt of some kind and perhaps was filming for social media.

Granted. Occam’s razor dictates that the man was sick in some capacity and needed help. But the narrative that he was suicidal was there from the beginning and carried through to the end.

REGARDLESS OF ISAAC STATING MULTIPLE TIMES THE PREVIOUS WEEK THAT HE WASN’T SUICIDAL. BOTH IN VIDEO AND TO HIS FRIENDS PERSONALLY.

Can someone say that those who are not suicidal commit suicide? Sure. Of course. (More on this in the “last recorded video” and “Isaacs final letter” sections.

Official Investigation Mistakes

The breadth and depth of the investigation were treated as that of a much more minor and less important investigation. Even though Sgt. Jamison advised he would contact on-call criminal investigations after Deputy Luna notified him that the incident had turned fatality.
The sheriff’s report was only eight pages in its entirety, of which five pages were right up of the three-hour investigation which took place after Isaac’s death. This included all witness statements as well as the search of the Isaac hotel room at the Days Inn which according to the body can footage took all of a minute and a half.
Even though authorities were aware, the totality and magnitude of Isaac’s celebratory status, recent history, and exposing pedophiles and pedophile network rings in Hollywood and Washington DC did not appear to factor into the evidence gathered at the scene (ie ISAAC’S IPHONE) or the circumstances of the event.
Detective Pat Barr was provided Isaacs iPhone on the scene by a firefighter and he saw text messages being pushed to the notification screen stating in all his words ——“one of the messages mentions some of the rumors going around and that, that person thought it best that Isaac “leave the room until the situation could be figured out.” We also noted in his pocket, he had a door card for the Days Inn located at the same Belmont exit room 234. This led me to believe that the text message referring to him leaving the room which was aimed at 4 AM that morning could be referring to the room at the motel and there was some suspicion that there could someone in the room and possibly some criminal allegation against him.”—— although officers Barr, Jamison, and Luna responded to the room they determined in less than two minutes the nothing had transpired there. No fingerprints were taken and the room was barely searched having only been given a quick walk-through, which you can see in the body cam footage. If anything, the fact that the room was barely used could have determined that the room was used for a meeting place and not for lodging. But no mention of any of this was ever made in the report.
Video footage of Isaac checking in to the Days Inn hotel was never acquired.
The cigarettes and Isaac’s possession were not found at the scene when a search of his effects was made. They were later discovered at the corners office and noted in the autopsy report.
The investigating officer failed to verify the Deck brother’s story that they were at the pilot for coffee.
There were no interviews of any employees at the pilot station to verify the Deck brother’s story that they were there, nor was there any video footage taken from the security camera at the pilot station to verify their timing on the bridge.
There was no follow-up to determine where Isaac obtained the business card for the tire shop, which could have shown he met someone after he arrived in Bellemont at 1:30 am. An accurate narrative could have been gleaned in which to accurately determine what Isaac may or may not have been doing on the bridge that morning had the investigating officer spoken to the person who potentially gave him the business card. Instead, the officers assumed Isaacs’s thoughts and actions and postulated their narrative as the probable course and official events.
No forensics of the tire were performed. Seeing that Isaac Kappy mentioned to several people that he was going to be torn limb from limb, had committed treason, and is going to die in a public execution to atone for his mistakes, one would think to investigate the matter which landed him in the middle of nowhere prior to his death. Instead, the shreds from the tire were never picked up from the side of the highway and the rim of his front right tire was never examined.
Isaacs body was never properly identified. Isaac was never identified at the medical examiner’s office by a family member for anyone who knew him. In fact, the parents refused the opportunity to identify the body upon the advice of the medical examiner.
The push notifications of the text messages on Isaacs’s iPhone do not reveal the amount of information the cops are claiming. The investigating officer assumed much and took the liberty to script a narrative in his report.
The first witness I interviewed, the employee at the pilot station, stated to me that when an officer comes into the store to notify her they were rerouting traffic nearby, she told the officer she had information regarding the dead man under the bridge. However, officers never returned to speak with her or contacted her for an interview and never even took her last name.
No witnesses were ever called back at any time for a secondary follow-up interview, even after they determined the magnitude of Isaac Kappy’s social and political significance. We know for an absolute fact due to social media that dozens and dozens of people called all the agencies in Coconino County, AZDPS, and the Coconino County Medical Examiners office requesting records.
In his report, detective Barr states that Isaacs’s father informed him that Isaac was returning from California to live back home in Albuquerque. This is not true. In conversations with the family, they made it clear that this was never said and that Isaac was simply visiting for Mother’s Day. They were also quite disturbed that something that insignificant could have been misinterpreted and written down in official documentation. It made them wonder about the competency of the rest of the investigation.
In the Sheriff’s report (page 8) Detective Barr states “Family describes Isaac as being despondent.” The family states that this was never said.
In the corners report the medical examiner states that Isaacs’s hair is black when in fact it is brown.
The medical examiner stated as his conclusion in the official report—-” Based on the autopsy findings in investigative history that is available to me, it is my opinion that Isaac Kappy died as a result of multiple blunt force injuries. Reportedly, the decedent was witness to jump off an overpass on Interstate 40 and subsequent was struck by a pickup truck. The manner of death is suicide.” ——The medical examiner had no idea why, if, or exactly how Isaac fell from the bridge other than what was written in a report which is the product of a three-hour investigation. I don’t believe it is possible for the medical examiner to have made the determination that the manner of death was suicide. The most he could have honestly possibly discerned as a doctor is that Isaac died as a result of multiple blunt force injuries.
An extremely brief online investigation into Isaacs’s social media world would have revealed that there was a prophecy made about Judas Iscariot the previous year and that there was an entire body of online characters who pushed and discussed this prophecy and the drama it created. Further investigation would’ve revealed that key people who had been in constant contact with Isaac during his last months were also infatuated with this prophecy and may have contributed to Isaacs’s mental breakdown, psychosis, depression, etc. which landed him into the position he was in. The point being, that there is a rich and extremely large body of documented evidence online which would without a doubt contribute to the understanding of the events that led up to the incident. Maybe even eventually finding criminal culpability in some of those social media circles.
On page 5 of the sheriff’s report, it lists the case status as “CLOSED/LEADS EXHAUSTED” this is obviously not the case. So not so as to make it laughable if the situation wasn’t so tragic.
Officer Barr combines interviews for his report. His reasoning was “they provided essentially the same information, so I have combined the interviews for this report.” Is that legal? Or just bad detective work? In the case of a suicide/death, one would think that the bar would be held a little higher. It is completely possible that the two brothers if interviewed separately would have recounted different facts to the event that they witnessed independently in respect of their position, actions, and respect of involvement during the event.
The investigating officer never asked the deck brothers why they believed the subject was contemplating suicide. Furthermore, they never did a follow-up investigation with them, at least any that are recorded and documented in the official reports.

Conflicting Testimony

Cellphone

In the bodycam footage labeled “Luna 1” a firefighter walks up to officer Barr and hands him a black iPhone saying “Hey there officer, this was layin’ in the lane, I don’t know if it’s theirs, I don’t know if it’s his, but was laying right over here about where he’d be.” and pointed back up the highway towards the firetrucks. When I called and spoke to John Koch (witness # five from the DPS report) he stated that when Isaac’s body was run over it “barely moved.” He stated several times that it was just “smushed down” but barely moved. He stated he was 15 feet from Isaac at the time. He went on to say that his head was pretty much in the same place in position it was after the truck hit him that it was before.

People have mentioned that this scene in the bodycam footage from Luna1 where a firefighter walks up and hands an unbroken iPhone to an officer on camera which is delivering evidence through push notifications “in time” as they speak, seemed a little scripted. Nevermind the fact that that same cell phone had just dropped 22 feet from an overpass either on its own or bounced out of Isaac’s pocket and managed not to break and lie in the middle of the highway and not get run over by multiple vehicles.

And forgetting for a moment that his phone didn’t break, how is it that Isaac’s iPhone managed to bounce out of his pocket while his passport, driver’s license, four credit/debit cards, multiple business cards, vehicle keys, and lighters all managed to stay in his pockets? I was offered the suggestion that it was because his cell phone was in his jacket pocket which has loose pockets. Still. A 22-foot fall and the phone bouncing out landing on the asphalt highway?

Scene Cleared

When I call the sheriffs office and inquired about the incident I was told at the scene was cleared and traffic was open by 10:30 AM
I had driven through that scene the previous day at 9:25 AM and there were no emergency vehicles and traffic was not being diverted at this time.
The tow truck driver for Winona Towing stated in a recorded phone conversation that when he picked up the vehicle at the Days Inn Hotel at 8:30 AM, all lanes of traffic were open and traffic was not being diverted.

I had a problem with this from the get-go. Other than Highway 93 for 10 years of my life and whenever a fatality occurred the highway was shut down for 6 to 8 hours at a time or longer on a regular basis. In the course of this investigation, I received multiple emails about a similar fatality in the area where a man jumped off a bridge in Flagstaff and that the road was shut down for eight hours.

Given all the strangeness involved in this case and Isaacs celebrity status, controversy, and political enemies, one would think that this suicide/death would rise to a level that would warrant a complete criminal investigation of any and everything connected to it. That would start with the scene of death. There weren’t even any diagrams in any of the reports positioning the witnesses, evidence, etc. The scene was cleaned up too fast for even that to happened.

Corners report

The corners report states that Isaac was wearing a light blue shirt while all photos of him including those from the Loves Travel Stop, the Camp Navajo security patrol – cam video, and the post-death crime scene photos all show him wearing white. Every 911 call description has him described as wearing white as well.

Dispatch Record

At the 52:50 mark you can hear an officer request:

Dispatch: “1215 Go ahead”

Officer: “Can you show me out at the county attorneys office for a 10-15 on 97?”

Dispatch: “10-4”

Code 1015 = Prisoner
Code 97 = Arived on scene

It would appear the officer in field was requesting to have his location shown in the official record to be somewhere other than where he was at the time. THIS IS HUGE.

What could this mean? Quite simply that there was a covert side opperation occuring during the initial response and officer 1215 was establishing a false location for official records purposes. This does give quite a bit of weight to the idea that Isaac went into hiding and was extracted by officers and taken into hiding.

ARIZONA DPS RADIO CODES & SIGNALS:

10-1   Weak/Unreadable signal    Code 3    Emergency
10-2   Loud & Clear signal       Code 4    No assistance needed
10-4   Affirmative/Understood    Code 7    Out to eat
10-7   Out of Service/Off Duty   Code 9    Representative / House of
10-8   In Service/Start of Duty            Representatives
10-9   Please Repeat             Code 10   Senator/Senate
10-10  Out at                    Code 20   Security check
10-11  Dispatching too fast      Code 34   Motorist assist
10-12  Officials/Visitors pres.  Code 101  Woman in car
10-14  Convoy / Escort           Code 102  Woman out of car
10-15  Prisoner                  Code 103  Out at Headquarters
10-16  Insane person             Code 105  Open gate
10-17  Papers / Package          Code 106  Close gate
10-19  Return to or enroute to   Code 211  Armed robbery
10-20  Location                  Code 417  Subject with wapon
10-21  Telephone                           G = Gun, K = Knife
10-22  Disregard/Cancel          Code 451  Homicide
10-24  Trouble at station        Code 692  D.W.I.
10-27  Driver License Check      Code 693  Careless/reckless drivere
10-28  Stolen/Wanted Check       Code 702  Speeding vehicle
10-30  Against regulations       Code 901  Cutting/Shooting
10-35  Confidential information  Code 926  Wrecker needed
10-37  Name of operator          Code 961  Accident (No injury)
10-38  Wants/Warrants "hit"      Code 962  Accident (Injury)
10-40  Stolen vehicle            Code 963  Accident (Fatal)
10-42  Officer at home                     (961, 962, 963 "A" means
10-43  No traffic                          DPS unit involved)
10-45  Meet the unit at _____    Code 964  Accident (Unknown Injuries)
10-46  Any traffic?              Code 998  Officer involved in shooting
10-50  Payroll check             Code 999  Officer needs help urgently
10-51  Use caution               Code 1381 Impaired driver
10-52  Unit -- Switch channels   
10-82  Reserve room for officer  
10-90  Officer requires assist.
10-97  Arrived at scene                    
10-98  Assignment completed                
                                 
Code 1 Bomb threat              
Code 2 Urgent

Eyewitness Testimony Conflict

I’d like to start by saying that I’m not necessarily accusing Mr. John Koch of anything. He was very polite and forthcoming in our interview and came across as very trustworthy and genuine. The discrepancy in this testimony is just that. A discrepancy. And I feel it should be addressed in some capacity at some level for the purpose of full transparency.

John’s opening statement in the 911 call is:

“Yes, I’d like to report a man sitting on a guardrail of a bridge at 185 in Bellemont, Arizona.”

At no time in the 911 call did Mr. Koch mention the Deck Brothers who would have been approaching and actively attempting to restrain Isaac while Mr. Koch was speaking the words he was to the 911 operator. Nor did Mr. Koch mention anything about them in his written witness statement. I would think it extremely relevant/important/critical price of information that 2 men rapidly approached a man who was “Sitting on the gaurdrail” while the call was being made. There certainly would have been enough time to think to mention it in the written statement.

ALSO. In the 911 call Mr. Koch says “Yes, I’d like to report a man sitting on a guardrail of a bridge at 185 in Bellemont, Arizona.”

However, in his conversation with me, he states that Isaac was facing west putting his leg over the rail over and over as if attempting to build up the courage to jump. AND the Deck brothers stated that Isaac was “Sitting with his back to the west flailing his arms trying to catch his balance as if he was attempting to fall backward.

AND the dashcam security footage shows Isaac sitting calmly appearing to be meditating.

SO WHICH IS IT? We have 4 versions of an event from two people and a camera.

Mr. Koch told me he had exited Highway I-40 and turned into the pilot station. He lives west of Bellemont so he was traveling eastbound. He said he did not notice whether or not Isaac was sitting on the bridge when he drove across the overpass the first time while heading to the pilot station. He did say, however, that he saw him acting erratically when crossing it again to get back on the highway. I asked him what was Isaac was doing that seemed “erratic?”

He stated that Isaac was acting very bizarre. John states he saw Isaac keep putting one leg over the overpass barrier/guardrail and half sitting on it like he was going to jump off but then pulled his leg back again. He stated he did this a number of times like he was building up the courage to jump.

Next, John says that at 7:20 am “He wasn’t there.” We know that the Camp Navajo security dashcam footage shows Isaac sitting on the overpass seemingly mediating at exactly 7:20:32. Now, not all clocks are set to digital time but more and more are. Nor would I necessarily expect Mr. Koch or anyone to remember the exact time they witnessed something they wouldn’t know was going to be relevant in the next few minutes. But still, Mr. Koch states that Isaac wasn’t there at 7:20.

John witnessed Isaac putting his leg over the rail while passing him on the bridge southbound and then stopped on the south side where he dialed 911. He was looking in his rearview mirror at the situation while parked on the phone with 911 when you can hear him say “OH he just fell off the bridge.” You can then hear him tell the 911 operator that there are three other vehicles on the scene. John then headed down the overpass embankment to try to get to Isaac where he witnesses him get run over by Forrest Proctor’s F-150 10 feet away. You can then hear him tell the 911 operator that he is attempting to wave off other vehicles and that he thinks Isaac is dead.