SCENE PHOTOS AND VIDEOS

Official Photos Taken by and Received from the Coconino County Sheriffs Office

Official Photos Taken by and Received from the Arizona Department of Public Saftey

Note: only 35 of 52 of the photos are posted here. Due to the graphic nature of the remaining and out of respect for the surviving family members, we have chosen not to publish them.

All Body-Cam Incident Scene Footage

Officer Luna Body-Cam Footage #1

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y7Ju_fv2vJU&feature=youtu.be

Officer Luna Body-Cam Footage #2

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ny2vkuwOrss&feature=youtu.be

Officer Luna Body-Cam Footage #3

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6h31dDROdCk&feature=youtu.be

Officer Jamison Body-Cam Footage #1

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YEiKeZlvtHo&feature=youtu.be

Officer Jamison Body-Cam Footage #2

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6DGqw_CGA78&feature=youtu.be

Camp Navajo Security Patrolman Private Dash-cam Video

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7AZF3NIaXF4&feature=youtu.be

The above dashcam footage was some of the last evidence to be released by the investigating authorities during this investigation. It was not included with the original evidence I ordered from the Sheriff’s office two months prior. Although there was reference made to this video evidence in the Sheriff’s report and a truncated, much shorter, cell phone recording of it was made available to the immediate family within a week of the incident, the actual evidence obtained by the sheriff department from the witness who provided it was not put into evidence until approximately two months later.

I was first informed when calling back for the evidence that they could not release it to me because the evidence belonged to another investigational body. I informed them that they had already released it and it was listed in the report itself so it must be in evidence. They agreed to send it to me however I had to call five days later because I never got sent. It was then emailed to me directly within minutes.

It is not an exaggeration to say that this is easily the most highly suspicious piece of evidence released by the authorities in the course of this investigation. Upon releasing this video on YouTube and my twitter feed I estimate that there was approximately a 90% rate of organic suspicion concerning the footage itself. Other YouTubers subsequently released the footage with similar responses. One of the only channels to find no suspicion with the footage was LiftTheVeil who used the evidence to strengthen his narrative, which is also the official narrative has put forth by the authorities. To be fair, one member of my research team also feels the video is authentic and not doctored in any way. (yes, I attempted to maintain a balanced team throughout this investigation)

We know a couple of things in regards to this video.

  1. Isaac is deceased and that was his body below the overpass
  2. The dashcam video is highly contested and considered suspect by the majority of people who have viewed it.
  3. No ironclad proof has come forward at this time proving that the video was doctored in any way. (If you have expertise in video editing and believe you can help prove this one way or the other please get in touch.)
  4. The homeless man who looked identical to Isaac has not been seen since May 12 and has never been seen since.
  5. The dashcam evidence released two weeks ago was not entered into the evidence been until a few days prior to my receiving. The Coconino Sheriffs Dept claimed it was actually sent to the Department of Public Safety on accident instead. That being said I did not receive this video when I ordered all the evidence from the state either. If this was the case, it should have been in the DPS evidence bin.
  6. This original evidence was never sent to the family but instead, a 17-second cell phone recording of the screen playing it with no sound was provided as evidence that their son was on top of the overpass moments before the event.
  7. No one saw Isaac walk to the bridge or actually get into position on the rail that morning. No security camera footage from the pilot station was obtained which would have seen Isaac walk across the parking lot. There is been no video evidence obtained from the Days Inn Hotel either. No one saw Isaac walk out to the bridge. Even the eyewitness I interviewed, a 911 caller and one of the primary witnesses to the incident, did not see Isaac in front of the Pilot truck stop on the bridge when he first drove across it only minutes prior.
  8. There’s a huge discrepancy between Isaac’s behavior as is portrayed in this video and his behavior as relayed to the 911 operators moments later. This discrepancy is also noted in the eyewitness testimonies found in the Department of Public Safety reports and my independent interviews.
  9. There is no other person or moving object in any frame of the video once the vehicle turns onto the bridge and approaches Isaac’s position. This means there is no other human reference or reference of motion.
  10. Isaac does not move at all in the entirety of this footage. Even though the vehicle recording the footage passed only feet from him and in the footage you can see two other vehicles crossing the bridge while the security patrol vehicle is on the off-ramp.
  11. The pixelation is horrible and the resolution of this video is atrocious. When the vehicle moves past Isaac immediate background behind Isaac is out of focus and there’s a portion haloing Isaac that is extremely blurry. If the resolution is this bad from a few feet away how come when the patrol vehicle is on the off-ramp we can see what looks like Isaac on the bridge in the distance. There appears to be a little white figure sticking up on the bridge at least a quarter-mile away.

Leave a comment